The punchline for May:
- No dividend cuts
- No dividend raises
- Manulife (MFC) drops from the list due to price accumulation (and Shaw [SJR.B] is back in)
*Note: we do not recommend that monthly changes in the portfolio should trigger any trading. Most BTSX users rebalance annually.
I made a mistake. For all my efforts to ensure the accuracy of the numbers and calculations for my first Beating the TSX article in the Canadian MoneySaver a few months ago, an error slipped through: The published stock prices for the portfolio were based on Dec 24th, 2018 (when I drafted the article), instead of the beginning of 2019.
The error was brought to my attention by a fastidious reader of this blog who noticed that the price column in Figure 5 of the CMS article did not match the prices in Table 3 of the article on this site, like they should. Fortunately, the results of this error are minimal: there is no impact on what stocks appear in the portfolio nor any of the performance calculations.
But that is not to say that the error is inconsequential. The consequence for me is embarrassment and a determination to do better. The consequence for you should be to understand that I, you, and all investors, professional or retail, are human and, therefore, fallible.
Not an expert
“It’s when you’re not humble that you end up doing things that will make you humble.”Francois Rochon
What makes someone a financial authority? Turn on BNN or your favourite financial news station. Unfortunately, the impression of authority often arises from a river of bold predictions, overconfidence, and charisma. Occasionally, it is knowledge. Rarely, true skill.
I, on the other hand, have none of these things. What I have is some experience and familiarity with an investment method that is simple, rational, and has a history of long-term out-performance. The superstar is Beating the TSX and dividend investing. I am the messenger – a DIY investor like you who happens to enjoy blogging. One of the best things about BTSX is that you don’t need to be an expert to get excellent results.
My many mistakes
In fact, my fallibility extends beyond technical errors like the one above. Errors of judgement are even more common and insidious. Here is a list of just a few of the errors I’ve made over the years:
- Paid high fees for actively managed mutual funds
- Was ignorant of financial advisors’ conflicts of interest
- Bought high, sold low (a few times)
- Thought I could be the next Warren Buffet
- Didn’t have a written investment plan for years
- Made trades based on “hot tips”
- Tried to time the market
- Let emotion influence investment decisions
- Wasted money on large, unnecessary purchases
- Chased high yield, ignoring fundamentals
Yes, that’s right. I’ve done all that and more. Despite these errors, the combination of a decent income, controlled spending, and, most importantly, a determination to learn from my mistakes, our family became financially independent when I was 42 years old. You don’t have to be perfect.
Re-framing financial failures
“The humility required for good judgment is not self-doubt—the sense that you are untalented, unintelligent, or unworthy. It is intellectual humility. It is a recognition that reality is profoundly complex, that seeing things clearly is a constant struggle, when it can be done at all, and that human judgment must therefore be riddled with mistakes.”Philip Tetlock
Perhaps publicizing my mistakes will help you avoid them. On the other hand, I don’t know a single successful investor without their own colourful and entertaining history of foibles, large and small. Some people think that stepping in the mud, even falling face-first into it, early in your investing life might be the best thing that could happen to you. I tend to agree.
But that doesn’t mean the mistakes will stop, just that, hopefully, we will not make the same ones. The world doesn’t cease to be complex. We don’t cease to be human.
As for me, I have notified The Canadian MoneySaver of my error and am drafting a notification to be published as soon as possible. As a volunteer writer, I am hoping they will provide more editorial support, but ultimately the responsibility lies with yours truly.
Scientific proof of maybe
Ultimately, our goal is financial independence, not bullet-proof infallibility. We could walk our investment paths in isolation, but you’re here because you recognize there are benefits of a cooperative approach. It is my sincerest hope that this site is helpful in that regard, but we must be able to trust our sources of information: not their rightness, rather, as Tetlock says, their intellectual humility.
My background is in science. Most people trust the integrity of knowledge based on science not because it is free of error but because the method is, by definition, transparent, and open to scrutiny. It’s greatest strength is not in being “right” but the openness to being wrong and adapting.
This is a useful principle for life, in general, and investing, in particular: Make mistakes, own them, learn from them. I can’t commit to an error-free standard, but I will commit to that.